eastindia
11-16 02:12 PM
Interesting
In FY 2007 there were 18 States with over 1,000 certifi
ed PERM positions, and in FY 2008 there were only
12. Following this trend, there were only eight States
in FY 2009 with over 1,000 certifi ed PERM positions,
and in FY 2009 the number of positions approved in
each of these eight States declined signifi cantly. The
most signifi cant decreases occurred in California, Texas,
and Illinois, where the number of positions approved
declined over 45 percent from FY 2008. The most
demanded occupational positions in FY 2009 were
found in the Information Technology industry, with the
Advanced Manufacturing and Finance industries also
drawing a large number of position requests.
STATES
In FY 2007 there were 18 States with over 1,000 certifi
ed PERM positions, and in FY 2008 there were only
12. Following this trend, there were only eight States
in FY 2009 with over 1,000 certifi ed PERM positions,
and in FY 2009 the number of positions approved in
each of these eight States declined signifi cantly. The
most signifi cant decreases occurred in California, Texas,
and Illinois, where the number of positions approved
declined over 45 percent from FY 2008. The most
demanded occupational positions in FY 2009 were
found in the Information Technology industry, with the
Advanced Manufacturing and Finance industries also
drawing a large number of position requests.
STATES
wallpaper jessica-alba-hair-styles-09.
Flo
01-08 09:23 AM
I've had my I-140, I-485 pending since August 2007 in Nebraska and i just started getting worried recently when i found out that the job title in the I-140 does not match the job name in my labor cert.
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
My labor cert took 4 years to be approved and in the meantime my job changed. It is still in the same field/department, in the same company, but it just evolved but still requires the same skills as the labor cert.
I was originally on H-1B and now i work with my EAD. My H1B was amended when my job changed but not the labor cert since we were well into the process when all this happened.
This is really the only concern that i have regarding the approval of my I-140 and I-485. Do any of you know if the job name difference would be a problem for the I-140 to be approved? At the least i hope they would send me an RFE and not deny it right away.
Thanks for any advice you could give me!
:o)
Macaca
08-05 07:16 AM
The Congress So Far (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/08/04/AR2007080401272.html) An ugly finish to a rocky start, August 5, 2007
FORGET ABOUT November's bipartisan promises of civility and cooperation in Congress. At the time they seemed overly optimistic. Nonetheless, it is hard to believe that relations could have deteriorated so far so fast -- both between the new Democratic majority and congressional Republicans and between Democratic lawmakers and President Bush.
Thursday's late-night rumble on the House floor, when a vote was gaveled to what Democrats acknowledge was a premature close, epitomized the ugliness that has overtaken the entire legislative process. In the end, the 110th Congress headed for its August recess with civility in shreds and achievements sparse. Indeed, the only thing that might make August look pleasant is September, when lawmakers will return to resume the acrimonious debate over Iraq policy and confront the looming end of the fiscal year with spending bills unpassed and presidential vetoes in the offing.
There have been scraps of good news from the first seven months. Lawmakers managed to see two of their priorities become law: an increase in the minimum wage and passage of the recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission. Another major achievement, a lobbying and ethics reform bill that will make important changes in the way Washington does business, is awaiting Mr. Bush's signature. Both chambers passed versions of a measure to extend the health insurance program for children in low-income families.
But many other Democratic priorities -- and a big presidential one, immigration reform -- were snarled in the Senate. The 60-vote majority needed to overcome a filibuster proved to be as big an impediment for majority Democrats as the Democrats had made it when Republicans held power. The failure of immigration reform, of which there had been at least a hope of bipartisan achievement, was a particularly low note. Meanwhile, Democrats in both chambers chose to spend countless hours mired in a fruitless effort to compel an "end" to the war in Iraq.
One of the most disappointing recent developments has been the administration's apparent decision, in the aftermath of the immigration bill's failure, that there was not much to be gained from working with this Congress -- and something to gained by taking it on. This new belligerence has manifested itself in a blizzard of veto threats -- Democrats counted up 31 between May 1 and Aug. 1 -- the most regrettable of which involves the children's health insurance bill.
In the final hours before recess, it was hard to know which was more shameful: the administration's use of the looming vacation to bully Democrats into accepting its overbroad rewrite of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or Democrats' spinelessness in caving to this strong-arming.
On the House side, a major disappointment was the failure of Democrats to live up to their pledge to treat the new Republican minority better than Democrats were treated when Republicans held power. Democrats promised a new, more open House, with adequate time for members to digest complex legislation and ample opportunity for the minority to offer amendments on the floor; instead, they, too, often used the same hardball tactics to muscle through legislation that Republicans had employed. That might have been understandable in the Democrats' "first 100 hours" that the new Congress was in session, but it is unfortunate that it persisted until the recess. That's no way to do business, and Democrats know it.
FORGET ABOUT November's bipartisan promises of civility and cooperation in Congress. At the time they seemed overly optimistic. Nonetheless, it is hard to believe that relations could have deteriorated so far so fast -- both between the new Democratic majority and congressional Republicans and between Democratic lawmakers and President Bush.
Thursday's late-night rumble on the House floor, when a vote was gaveled to what Democrats acknowledge was a premature close, epitomized the ugliness that has overtaken the entire legislative process. In the end, the 110th Congress headed for its August recess with civility in shreds and achievements sparse. Indeed, the only thing that might make August look pleasant is September, when lawmakers will return to resume the acrimonious debate over Iraq policy and confront the looming end of the fiscal year with spending bills unpassed and presidential vetoes in the offing.
There have been scraps of good news from the first seven months. Lawmakers managed to see two of their priorities become law: an increase in the minimum wage and passage of the recommendations of the Sept. 11 commission. Another major achievement, a lobbying and ethics reform bill that will make important changes in the way Washington does business, is awaiting Mr. Bush's signature. Both chambers passed versions of a measure to extend the health insurance program for children in low-income families.
But many other Democratic priorities -- and a big presidential one, immigration reform -- were snarled in the Senate. The 60-vote majority needed to overcome a filibuster proved to be as big an impediment for majority Democrats as the Democrats had made it when Republicans held power. The failure of immigration reform, of which there had been at least a hope of bipartisan achievement, was a particularly low note. Meanwhile, Democrats in both chambers chose to spend countless hours mired in a fruitless effort to compel an "end" to the war in Iraq.
One of the most disappointing recent developments has been the administration's apparent decision, in the aftermath of the immigration bill's failure, that there was not much to be gained from working with this Congress -- and something to gained by taking it on. This new belligerence has manifested itself in a blizzard of veto threats -- Democrats counted up 31 between May 1 and Aug. 1 -- the most regrettable of which involves the children's health insurance bill.
In the final hours before recess, it was hard to know which was more shameful: the administration's use of the looming vacation to bully Democrats into accepting its overbroad rewrite of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act or Democrats' spinelessness in caving to this strong-arming.
On the House side, a major disappointment was the failure of Democrats to live up to their pledge to treat the new Republican minority better than Democrats were treated when Republicans held power. Democrats promised a new, more open House, with adequate time for members to digest complex legislation and ample opportunity for the minority to offer amendments on the floor; instead, they, too, often used the same hardball tactics to muscle through legislation that Republicans had employed. That might have been understandable in the Democrats' "first 100 hours" that the new Congress was in session, but it is unfortunate that it persisted until the recess. That's no way to do business, and Democrats know it.
2011 Jessica Alba: Then and Now
Blog Feeds
05-17 12:40 PM
The NY Times' Nina Bernstein reports on spouses of US citizens who are facing exile for technical and minor violations of their visa status. DHScomes off fairly sympathetically in the story - the implication is they were trying to help and the mean courts and the dysfunctional Congress are to blame. But ICE has a lot of discretion in deciding who to put in to deportation proceedings. They have been encouraged to look at the facts of every case and use common sense in determining which people to put in deportation proceedings. They are not obligated to put every person...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/from-the-department-of-do-you-feel-safer.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/05/from-the-department-of-do-you-feel-safer.html)
more...
zoxtannin
03-22 02:57 AM
Got an offer this year from a New Jersey based company called PR Consultants. Does anyone has any information about this company? Any help can be really useful ..
cookeroo
07-23 11:57 AM
now that you said that... :D
more...
snehal
11-12 07:15 PM
Multiple H1 Stamping
Hi guys
I have a query; I had applied for H1 visa (2007 � 2008) from 2 places
One from my current working company and another from consultancy firm in US. I got through the lottery from both the places. I have done my stamping for the visa from consulting firm.
Now my question is will I be allowed to go for stamping again :rolleyes:. What are my options now if I want my visa stamped from my current working company :confused:.
Hi guys
I have a query; I had applied for H1 visa (2007 � 2008) from 2 places
One from my current working company and another from consultancy firm in US. I got through the lottery from both the places. I have done my stamping for the visa from consulting firm.
Now my question is will I be allowed to go for stamping again :rolleyes:. What are my options now if I want my visa stamped from my current working company :confused:.
2010 hair photo jessica alba
spicy_guy
06-22 04:17 PM
Proposed immigration measure stirs up Nebraska city - CNN.com (http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/06/21/fremont.immigration.ballot/index.html?iref=NS1)
more...
pan123
01-10 02:12 PM
Guys,
I remember I have seen this in some thread but I can't find it now. So I am repeating question here:
My receipt number starts with EAC. In order to check processing times, which service center I should be looking at?
Thanks,
I remember I have seen this in some thread but I can't find it now. So I am repeating question here:
My receipt number starts with EAC. In order to check processing times, which service center I should be looking at?
Thanks,
hair Jessica Alba
i4u
06-29 08:28 AM
What is the purpose of knowing which center processed?
more...
nocomment
09-23 09:22 PM
my pd march 2002 pending 485 any estimated time to get 485 approved?
EB2 or EB3?
EB2 or EB3?
hot Jessica Alba alla cerimonia di
rinkurinku
03-28 01:01 AM
Hello,
I have already filed I-751 under removal from country results in extreme hardship,I am going through divorce process,I want to change cateogory in I-751 [marrige entered into good faith but terminated by divorce] ,so please anybody can tell me that when I will get me my divorce decree I have to refile new I-751 for cateogory change into------marriage entered into good faith but terminated by divorce.so plz help me i need to refile or just only amendment letter to uscis.if any body has gone through this process plz help me.
thank you.
I have already filed I-751 under removal from country results in extreme hardship,I am going through divorce process,I want to change cateogory in I-751 [marrige entered into good faith but terminated by divorce] ,so please anybody can tell me that when I will get me my divorce decree I have to refile new I-751 for cateogory change into------marriage entered into good faith but terminated by divorce.so plz help me i need to refile or just only amendment letter to uscis.if any body has gone through this process plz help me.
thank you.
more...
house In this photo: Jessica Alba,
rajesh_kamisetty
08-03 09:33 AM
Why should we join the cause and raise our collective voice?
"Squeaky wheel gets the grease."
"Crying baby gets milk first." (probably not from English..but heard from a friend)
Why should we _do anything more than writing on forums?
"Actions Speak Louder Than Words"
"All Bark And No Bite"
(hahaha.. that's what i am doing right now)
Why should we stop infighting?
"A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand."
"All In The Same Boat" (more or less)
What do you think?
"Squeaky wheel gets the grease."
"Crying baby gets milk first." (probably not from English..but heard from a friend)
Why should we _do anything more than writing on forums?
"Actions Speak Louder Than Words"
"All Bark And No Bite"
(hahaha.. that's what i am doing right now)
Why should we stop infighting?
"A House Divided Against Itself Cannot Stand."
"All In The Same Boat" (more or less)
What do you think?
tattoo Jessica Alba with Nice Long
raysaikat
03-05 11:06 AM
Hi,
My visa expires in May 2009. I applied for OPT and starting date will be from June 1st 2009. I want to go to India in the last quarter of 2009. How do I get a valid visa. Should I get a new F1 Visa? Please help me..
OPT is a part of F1, it is not a new status. Technically you can get a VISA stamp for your F1 during OPT, and many do get, but you need to prove "no intent to immigrate" during your VISA interview and that's harder to do when you are on OPT and working for some company.
My visa expires in May 2009. I applied for OPT and starting date will be from June 1st 2009. I want to go to India in the last quarter of 2009. How do I get a valid visa. Should I get a new F1 Visa? Please help me..
OPT is a part of F1, it is not a new status. Technically you can get a VISA stamp for your F1 during OPT, and many do get, but you need to prove "no intent to immigrate" during your VISA interview and that's harder to do when you are on OPT and working for some company.
more...
pictures hairstyles jessica alba dress
nk2006
10-05 08:57 AM
Hi,
My company applied for PERM for me. Short of asking our HR/attorney everyday what is the way to check status.
Its applied just last week and but I can resist the urge to check the status already (anxious because I need H1B extension soon). Any advice is appreciated. thanks.
My company applied for PERM for me. Short of asking our HR/attorney everyday what is the way to check status.
Its applied just last week and but I can resist the urge to check the status already (anxious because I need H1B extension soon). Any advice is appreciated. thanks.
dresses jessica alba background. film
Jaime
08-31 11:06 AM
We should think of starting this thread to organize bus rides from Texas. If we use U.S. Coachways, which is in most major cities, we could potentially have buses leave from the major metros (Houston, Dallas, San Antonio and Austin) or two or more buses leaving Houston and San Antonio in the south and picking up more people as they make their way north to Dallas and Austin. Beyond Texas, the buses could also pick people up in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, etc, or other states depending on the routes. Also, a great and reliable local Dallas bus company is "Buses by Bill"
Any thoughts guys?
http://www.uscoachways.com/about.php
Any thoughts guys?
http://www.uscoachways.com/about.php
more...
makeup jessica alba pregnant april
H1B-GC-NY
06-18 08:50 AM
Category: EB3 - PD: July 2003
Processing Center: NSC
I-140 application: Oct-2006
I485 application : July-02-2007
I140/I485 denial : April 2008
MTR application : April 2008
I485 reopened : June-2008
I140 approval : June 2008
I-765 [EAD] : Delivered September 2007
Question:
NSC is now processing July-28-2007.
Which is the processing DATE for my I485?
- PD
- I485 application
- I485 date the case was reopened
:confused:
Processing Center: NSC
I-140 application: Oct-2006
I485 application : July-02-2007
I140/I485 denial : April 2008
MTR application : April 2008
I485 reopened : June-2008
I140 approval : June 2008
I-765 [EAD] : Delivered September 2007
Question:
NSC is now processing July-28-2007.
Which is the processing DATE for my I485?
- PD
- I485 application
- I485 date the case was reopened
:confused:
girlfriend In this photo: Jessica Alba,
desiap
02-04 11:03 PM
I was on F-1 when I applied for I-485 (my wife was the primary applicant). My I-20 expired 6 months back, and I'm working on EAD. I'm planning to travel to India and use my AP for return. Will that be fine ?
What about my I-94 expiry ? I still have a 2 yr old I-94 on my passport, marked F-1/D-S.
What about my I-94 expiry ? I still have a 2 yr old I-94 on my passport, marked F-1/D-S.
hairstyles Jessica Alba
arsh007
06-17 03:39 PM
Skin test and X-ray have nothing to do with a USCIS Physician's reputation buth rather on the outcome of the physical exam. However what is important is the amount the Physician is charging for the medical examination. I have an appointment with Dr Alfred in St Louis next week at Forest Park Medical clinic. Appointments are very hard to get by in St Louis.
belmontboy
04-24 07:53 PM
Hi guys,
I know lobbying takes money, but i am not sure how much we need.
I see lots of emails about funding going around, but i am not getting any idea of how much exactly is needed.
Can the admins post a funding drive! and set some target - say, "100000$ funding drive". If we have a target, we can pitch in money and try to meet that. If we fall short, we know how much we need more, so that people can make extra contributions.
Once again, this is just my random thoughts.
I know lobbying takes money, but i am not sure how much we need.
I see lots of emails about funding going around, but i am not getting any idea of how much exactly is needed.
Can the admins post a funding drive! and set some target - say, "100000$ funding drive". If we have a target, we can pitch in money and try to meet that. If we fall short, we know how much we need more, so that people can make extra contributions.
Once again, this is just my random thoughts.
martinvisalaw
06-03 06:08 PM
You should change to H-4 (assuming you are eligible) if you are not working. You should be able to change back H-1B later and get the remainder of your 6 years, without being subject to the cap, if you find a new employer. It is important not to violate status now, and not working violates your H-1 status even if the lack of work is not your choice.
No comments:
Post a Comment